Curated items for this scope are still being collected. Below are the latest related updates; items meeting the curation criteria will be marked separately.
Latest related updates
19 OctMon
Mon
CFA Institute Research and Policy Center: PublicationsAI Score5454
A former equity strategy partner and independent investment firm operator used AI in retirement to backtest his long-standing personal strategy, which combined Peter Lynch's growth stock selection, Hilary Kramer's undervalued obscure stock selection, and earnings revision discipline. He corrected for survivorship bias, used point-in-time data, calculated pre-fee returns, and compared it against random stock selection from the same investment pool. The results showed that the strategy did not outperform random selection, with ordinary index funds performing better than the strategy.
Author Kris Longmore shares content from his 72-minute interview on The Algorithmic Advantage podcast, looking back on an early experience at a Sydney traders' meetup where he was unable to answer a proprietary trader's question about his own trading edge. He later joined that proprietary firm as a researcher and partner, and summarized relevant insights after leaving to trade independently.
Rob Carver has completed the final edits on his fifth trading book, "The Art And Science of Trading," scheduled for official publication on December 1 and now available for pre-order. Aimed at the mass market, this book serves as the unleveraged counterpart to his third book, "Leveraged Trading." It covers an introduction to trading delta-one instruments such as stocks, ETFs, and cryptocurrencies, explains trading science concepts like backtesting and the Kelly Criterion, and explores the integration of art and science within a semi-automated trading framework.
The article points out that data mining and AI-driven 'quant by feel' are identical in essence and philosophy, both attempting to skip the core step of understanding how markets work and profit directly from the market. A genuine trading edge requires identifying the counterparty being profited from, the reason they continue to pay, and the rationale for one's own ability to participate in the trade; such structural edge cannot be identified through backtesting optimization alone.
Drawing on two academic papers, the author identifies three structural limitations of using LLMs in trading research: First, training data is saturated with trading common sense and lacks mechanism-driven edge thinking. Second, across 35+ models, accuracy in time-series value tracking declines logarithmically as the number of historical updates increases, and neither prompt engineering nor expanding the context window can fix this. Third, outputs from 25+ models on open-ended questions show 71%–82% similarity, and models with different architectures converge to the same common answers.
The author notes that AI has dramatically lowered the barrier to developing quantitative strategies, enabling fully coded and backtested strategies to be generated within minutes. However, cheap experimentation amplifies the multiple-testing problem, producing a flood of false backtest results that appear effective but are actually overfit to noise.
