Skip to main content
Rob Carver:This Blog is Systematic· Rob Carver·· 2026-06-15AI Score62

Comparing Portfolio Optimization Shrinkage Methods Using Real Return Data: Backtesting Conclusions for Monte Carlo, Bootstrap, and Double Shrinkage

FIFA* World Cup (*Fitting and Forecasting Actual data) Portfolio Optimisation competition with real returns

AI summary

In the fourth installment of the Summer 2026 Portfolio Optimization Series, the author backtests Monte Carlo, bootstrap, double shrinkage, naive mean-variance, equal weight, maximum diversification, and EPO using real trading rule and instrument return data. Each test randomly selects 9 trading rules and one instrument, comparing portfolios over 1-, 5-, and 10-year in-sample periods and 1- and 5-year out-of-sample periods. The results show that under real data, correlation estimates are less stable than Sharpe ratios, requiring more correlation shrinkage rather than more Sharpe ratio shrinkage.

Source:Rob Carver:This Blog is Systematic · qoppac.blogspot.com

Next steps

WeiMind Backtesting System and AI SkillsIntegrate open-source tools and research methods into a reproducible backtesting workflow.WeChat Community and Contact InformationView official contact details; QR codes will be displayed on the About page once available.Prefer English? Get the research briefing by emailRegister your interest in English research updates on our website.