Skip to main content
4 OctSun
  1. Quantocracy32

    Quantocracy Latest Quantitative Research Link Roundup for October 3, 2026

    Quantocracy compiled recent links related to quantitative research on October 3, 2026, covering five topics: a backtest of Warren Buffett's contrarian investment advice, the performance of a Nasdaq-100 polynomial regression band strategy, the causes of the asset growth anomaly, a test of the U.S. stock turn-of-the-month effect, and a method for calculating transaction costs in macro trading strategies.

    Read original
3 OctSat
  1. Quantocracy35

    Quantocracy Latest Quantitative Research Link Roundup as of October 2, 2026

    Quantocracy has compiled the latest links related to quantitative research as of October 2, 2026, covering a range of quantitative research topics. These include 897,000 tests conducted on approximately 150 types of trading patterns, an analysis of the impact of 13 oil price surges on U.S. stocks since 1970, a study of asset performance during periods of rising bond yields from 1963 to 2026, and research on an attention factor based on the WallStreetBets herding effect and BERT sentiment.

    Read original
2 OctFri
1 OctThu
16 JulThu
  1. Aswath Damodaran:Musings on Markets75

    Aswath Damodaran releases 2026 edition of country risk research: drivers, measurement and investment implications

    Aswath Damodaran, Professor at New York University Stern School of Business, released the July 2026 edition of his country risk research, systematically outlining the drivers, measurement methods, and impact on corporate valuation and investment.

    Key Takeaways:You can learn the complete process of deriving country risk premiums for each country starting from the implied equity risk premium of mature markets, combined with sovereign ratings, default spreads, and relative volatility between stocks and bonds.

    Read original
1 JulWed
29 JunMon
  1. Rob Carver:This Blog is Systematic59

    Is Rolling Exponentially Weighted Estimation Better Than Full Sample: A Backtest Examination of Portfolio Optimization Parameters

    The authors use random subsample backtests to examine the effectiveness of exponentially weighted window estimates of the Sharpe ratio for portfolio optimization. They compare the out-of-sample Sharpe ratios of EWM spans of 5, 10, 20, and 30 years against full-sample estimates across various in-sample and out-of-sample periods.

    Read original
23 JunTue
22 JunMon
18 JunThu
  1. Rob Carver:This Blog is Systematic58

    Does Portfolio Optimization Need Clustering? A Backtest Examination Across Different Asset Sizes and Sample Lengths

    This is the sixth article in a portfolio optimization series. The author conducts hundreds of random backtests to examine the impact of different numbers of clusters, correlation shrinkage, SR shrinkage, and in-sample vs. out-of-sample lengths on out-of-sample Sharpe ratios across asset sizes of 20, 30, and 40. The results show that most parameter combinations have no significant differences, with only weak evidence that moderate clustering outperforms no clustering, and that the number of clusters should not be too large. The author ultimately recommends using an empirical value of 6 clusters when clear statistical evidence is lacking, while noting that clustering significantly increases optimization time.

    Read original
15 JunMon
  1. Rob Carver:This Blog is Systematic62

    Comparing Portfolio Optimization Shrinkage Methods Using Real Return Data: Backtesting Conclusions for Monte Carlo, Bootstrap, and Double Shrinkage

    In the fourth installment of the Summer 2026 Portfolio Optimization Series, the author backtests Monte Carlo, bootstrap, double shrinkage, naive mean-variance, equal weight, maximum diversification, and EPO using real trading rule and instrument return data. Each test randomly selects 9 trading rules and one instrument, comparing portfolios over 1-, 5-, and 10-year in-sample periods and 1- and 5-year out-of-sample periods. The results show that under real data, correlation estimates are less stable than Sharpe ratios, requiring more correlation shrinkage rather than more Sharpe ratio shrinkage.

    Read original
19 MayTue
12 MayTue